Christ Chapel And Arlington Heights Neighborhood Find Uneasy Truce

12
Posted May 8, 2013 by Jeff Prince in Blotch
Architect Tom Galbreath and Christ Chapel's chief operating officer Rick Neves represented the church during negotiations. (photo by jeff prince)Architect Tom Galbreath and Christ Chapel's chief operating officer Rick Neves represented the church during negotiations. (photo by jeff prince)

After a long day of meeting, debating, disagreeing, and, ultimately, compromising, everybody seemed tired if not exactly happy.

Christ Chapel Bible Church and homeowners in the Arlington Heights community reached an agreement that would somewhat restrict the church’s expansion for 40 years and create greener parking lots and buffers.

Christ Chapel had hoped the rezoning would pave the way to, er, pave the way further into the neighborhood (“Crying ’bout the Chapel,” Sept. 5, 2012).

Residents argued that the church had already wiped out about 50 homes while expanding several blocks into the historic neighborhood.

Rather than choose one side over the other, Fort Worth City Councilman Dennis Shingleton encouraged them to reach an agreement.

After yesterday’s deal was struck, Arlington Heights Neighborhood Association President Christina Patoski summed up her feelings while addressing the city council at last night’s meeting:

“It’s taken almost ten months to reach the compromise that our councilman last August charged us to find with Christ Chapel,” she said. “Given the political lay of the land, we believe this is the best possible outcome for the nearby property owners.”

Hmmm, “given the political lay of the land.”

What’s that mean?

Translation: When the P&Z says “heck yes” to re-zoning, and the district’s city councilman seems pretty okay with it, residents never felt like they had solid footing in negotiations.

“Sounds like y’all found an agreement that the neighborhood can live with, but isn’t thrilled about, and you’re still a little sore from the battle, but it could have been worse,” I summarized to Patoski afterward.

“That’s it in a nutshell,” she said. “We gave it everything we had to get what we could out of it. Our councilman holds the cards.”

Patoski’s podum speech wasn’t exactly triumphant.

“Please let the record reflect that a deep sense of loss remains among many people who live in Arlington Heights as they witness yet another block of their neighborhood wiped out by Christ Chapel Bible Church to make way for a parking lot that will be used less than 100 hours a year. For an institution that already has more than five acres of parking and is already profoundly over-parked.

“Let the record reflect that there are people in Arlington Heights who are disappointed that Christ Chapel would consider no other remedy for their parking deficit, except taking out more neighborhood homes, even though there are many other solutions that are more neighborhood-friendly.

“Let the record reflect that there are property owners in Arlington Heights who find deplorable the strong-arm land development tactics used by this church’s Building Committee to pave the way for this parking lot. Such as tearing down homes before receiving the necessary zoning changes. And building a parking lot around the homes of people who chose not to sell to the church.

“Let the record reflect that many in Arlington Heights are discouraged that all the safeguards established by our city government to protect neighborhoods have all failed so miserably. The zoning regulations, the Comprehensive Plan, the significant opposition from the nearby property owners, and the strong record of zoning case precedence, have all been ignored.”

Her final statement was another knife in the church’s gut:

“In closing, the lesson to be learned here is that when large institutions or other entities plan for future growth they must work together with all the property owners who could be impacted by that growth at the very beginning of the planning process, not after the fact. It works out better for everyone.”


12 Comments


  1.  
    Rexroth

    Must have been God’s plan that your cozy little neighborhood be torn down to make way for parking lots. That way church members can park, go inside their chapel and learn about the Golden Rule.




  2.  
    derwooka

    …good to know the church is connected with its community, at least physically…




  3.  
    Matt

    It is my opinion that a church should not need to have a “chief operating officer”. Corporations need COOs, not churches.

    And maybe therein lies the problem…..ahem.




  4.  
    Melissa

    This is my neighborhood. This is my neighborhood. I am disgusted with the city of Fort Worth for not stopping this encroachment 11 years ago. Shame on you.




    •  
      Melissa

      Shame on the church, too, for coming into a beautiful historic neighborhood and ruining it. Thank you, Fellowship Church, for picking a warehouse on the West Side to expand and not bulldozing and paving over people’s memories.




    •  
      Kim

      It’s sad when church becomes big business and leaves Christian teachings behind.




  5.  
    Jesus Wept

    Once again, Fort Worth’s planning totally revolves around parking. In most cities, if a church like this had so many attendees on Sundays, then the church-goers would park on the streets around the church. But the church can’t have any of their people walking a few blocks, and the AH neighborhood can’t have anyone going to church parking in front of their house. God forbid folks, doesn’t any realize that this part of FW is an URBAN environment. When you live in an URBAN environment or you go to church in an URBAN environment, where you park and where others park is not the top priority. It is one of the things you give up by living in an URBAN environment or go to chruch in an URBAN environment in exchange for not living in Benbrook. And FW thinks it can do pedestrian-friendly urban development someday. Very funny.




    •  
      Chris P

      The problem for the church is that when people parked on the street, like most of us rational folks would deem normal, homeowners in all directions complained loudly. So the church buys up some homes that border it, donates those homes to charity and moves them, and the neighbors freak out about that too. Nobody gives the church credit for spending millions on a parking garage in order to avoid inconveniencing the neighbors with on-street parking. It was a no-win.




  6.  
    Melvin

    I for one genuinely advocate the burning of churches. Deities are imaginary. Religion is a farce. Grow up. Evolve.




  7.  
    JM

    Churches like these can be revolving doors. After a while, more people are leaving than new people coming. The pendulum always swings the other way. What happens when the average attendants drops. They’ll move and sell the property to a Walmart or something like that.

    In my life time growing up, churches were rather small, did things to help their members and the community like shelters, food drives and or other community service. I went to one that built an orphanage. But these new trendy mega-churches seem to be all about glitz and glam with the latest in electronics, massive ballrooms, life coaches (GEEZ) and the likes. Next there will be a golf coarse and tennis courts for the members. Christ Chapel Country Club.




    •  
      Chris P

      Yes it’s unfortunate that Christ Chapel doesn’t do things like this:
      http://www.ccbcfamily.org/ministries/outreach/local-outreach/miscellaneous

      Seriously, not all large churches are the same. People tend to generalize way too much. If Christ Chapel wanted to be a traditional mega church, they would have moved out to the suburbs long ago (like Birchman Baptist did before them). You should do some research before throwing them into the same group as some of the others.




  8.  
    JM

    Checked out the link. (did my research) So, if you want to do charitable work, go volunteer for one of these other organizations on the list. I guess that way it doesn’t cost CCBC anything and leaves more cash to buy more houses. Just sayin…





Leave a Response

(required)


7 × = thirty five