Out With A Lout

5
Posted July 10, 2013 by STATIC in News
static

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram is the biggest backscratcher and apologist in town when it comes to the Tarrant Regional Water District, the governmental agency that works under a veil, discourages the release of public information, and appears more intent on seizing land for private commercial development than protecting this region’s water supplies.

Other news media, led by the Fort Worth Weekly, aren’t so willing to turn a blind eye. A recent editorial in the Fort Worth Business Press even demanded that water district General Manager Jim Oliver start acting more professionally — or resign.

“And if he persists in behaving like an unprofessional lout, the board should fire him,” the editorial concluded.

Lack of transparency among administrators and board members is the main reason that three challengers recently sought to unseat incumbents on the five-person board. Mary Kelleher is the only challenger who won a seat on May 11, but she quickly made her presence known. At her first board meeting last month, she refused to vote on any agenda items until an outside attorney verified that the board was adhering to the Texas Open Meetings Act.

Later, Kelleher went to the district’s administrative office and requested public information from an employee and was told to return that afternoon to pick it up. According to Kelleher, Oliver met her upon her return, pounded his chest, yelled at her, and demanded that she go through him for any records in the future (“Confrontation at the Water District,” June 27, 2013).

Kelleher wrote a letter to Oliver saying she hopes her future requests for public information “will not be met with raised voice, chest-pounding, disrespect, and other behavior unacceptable for a public servant, let alone the senior executive of the TRWD.”

The grinding of Oliver’s teeth could reportedly be heard as far away as Poughkeepsie. The district issued a statement denying that he had raised his voice.

Still, not even a mouse stirred at the Star-Telegram offices in downtown Fort Worth. The newspaper that practically begged voters to re-elect the incumbents and maintain the status quo has made no mention of Kelleher’s run-in with Oliver and the resulting fallout. But — notwithstanding the occasional excellent investigative piece and the work of some remaining ethical, talented reporters — the paper will gladly sell you a subscription if you want to help them suck up to power.


5 Comments


  1.  
    joan

    The Starry Eyed Telegraph has always been soft on controversy.
    Whether it involves the big money families, the government, big money corporations, racial matters or other topics, especially when the person or entity embroiled in the controversy has a friend in the newsroom.

    I stopped reading/buying it years ago when Deanna Boyd offered up a fluff piece on some New Blood Irish Travellers who had been involved in several serious crimes in the area.

    I was in law enforcement at that time an I along with my fellow offices was incensed and enraged over her portrayal of these career criminals.
    She boldly an bald faced lied for them. Describing them as hard working, honest, misunderstood migrant workers!

    The Dallas papers had more honesty reported on their involvement in the victimization of the elderly, the depth of their nationwide digital age organization, and even their involvement in falsification of state and federal documents and MURDER.

    One has to wonder if allegiance, involvement, alignment or getting in bed with the bad is a requirement at FWST.




  2.  
    Roy Batty

    ……Hmmm…..two words…Dave Lieber……




    •  
      Roy Batty

      …as in he was objective, independent, and did none of those things listed in Joan’s last paragraph and look what happened to him…..




  3.  
    Justice

    Why is it that big organizations feel the need to lie and cheat the public that has them in business in the first place? And not only that, but a crappy newspaper bends over every time and fails to publish the truth!? Do the subscribers not see that the Star basically censors what is or isnt deemed factual news, depending on who buys their decision making process for the right price! They have done this same crap with FWISD! No one knows what is truly going on, because they have all the media (except FWW) in their pockets! Too bad someone can’t investigate the corruption at the Star and report it only in the Weekly!




  4.  

    Useful information. Lucky me I discovered your web site accidentally, and I’m stunned why this accident didn’t took place in advance!

    I bookmarked it.





Leave a Response

(required)


2 × = ten