Keystone Election Kops

Nov. 5 was just a warm-up for what could be a sad circus in enforcing the new voter ID law.
15
Posted December 18, 2013 by KEN WHEATCROFT-PARDUE in News
Second

The new Texas voter ID law had one effect with which neither side can quibble. It got Fort Worth in the national news for something besides our weather or being forever and famously known as the place where former Baptist Sunday school teacher Willie Nelson lit up his first joint.

Before the Nov. 5election, Fort Worth was ground zero for Voter ID law news. Gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis’ signing of an affidavit when she voted early and former Speaker of the U.S. House Jim Wright’s problems in getting a state-issued personal identification card both made national news.

But what hasn’t been covered nationally or even locally is how the law’s implementation, at least in Tarrant County, wasn’t quite ready for prime time.

One election judge in a precinct near downtown tried to school me on the ins and outs of the law while he ate a fried chicken take-out lunch. He told me that if a voter showed up with an ID bearing a name that was “substantially similar” to what appeared on the voting rolls but that the addresses were the same on both the ID and the registration card, the judge could decide whether to have the voter initial the affidavit. Wrong!

The next day, Tarrant County Elections Administrator Steve Raborn confirmed that the judge was in error, and he didn’t seem very surprised about it. The similar addresses have nothing to do with whether the affidavit is required. And it is not up to the judge to decide. If the names are similar but not identical, the voter still must initial to affirm his or her identity.

When I went to vote at my regular polling place, a Knights of Columbus Hall, my driver’s license read Kenneth Pardue, but my voter registration card had me as Kenneth Wheatcroft-Pardue, sort of a textbook example of someone with “substantially similar” names who needed to initial the affidavit. But inexplicably, I wasn’t asked to initial anything, even when the election judge showed me a printout of the slide presentation that Raborn had used to train election workers. It showed as clear as day that voters with “substantially similar” names needed to initial the affidavits.

A friend on the western edge of Tarrant County thought she might have to initial the affidavit because her maiden name is on her driver’s license but not on her voter registration card. She, too, reported that she was never asked to initial the affidavit.

My own admittedly unscientific checking of polling places near where I live found that 2 percent of voters or less were asked to initial affidavits because of discrepancies between voter rolls and the forms of identification provided. For comparison, it was reported that in San Antonio a third of voters had to initial the affidavits; in Fort Bend County, the figure was 40 percent.

Before the election Raborn said he had no plans to count the number of voters who initialed the affidavits. After hearing of the uneven implementation, he told me he had decided to check on those numbers in order to find the election judges who are incorrectly interpreting the law.

This Keystone Kops-like implementation of the voter ID law points to the deeper problem that we have not only in Tarrant County or in Texas, but throughout the United States: a patchwork, partisan, and in many places incompetent system of administering elections.

Makes you wish for, what could we call it — a federal Voting Rights Act.

 

Ken Wheatcroft-Pardue, an essyist, poet, and short story writer from Fort Worth, can be reached at kwheatcroftpardue@yahoo.com.


15 Comments


  1.  
    loyd

    Typical liberal drivel, I bet they don’t mind showing ID to receive fraudulent social services!!




  2.  

    Confusion helps those jerks who feel that we have voter fraud problem when we don’t. Bad law leads to bad planning leads to bad implementation.




    •  
      loyd

      I guess it’s acceptable for thousands of dead people’s votes to be counted and it’s also acceptable for people to vote numerous times in the same election,
      now tell me again we don’t have voter fraud!




  3.  
    Stoutimore

    Sure thing. The feds could do a much better job. And Kathleen Sebelius would be just the person to oversee it. She has extensive experience running a massive federal program. No Keystone Kops with her.




  4.  

    Gee loyd, please tell me how that tea party kool-aid tastes. There hasn’t been the kind of voting you mention in those numbers since Lyndon Johnson was 1st elected to the US Senate. Not in the 21st century. Without a doubt that does happen in incredibly low numbers in some places but never enough to sway an election one way or the other. So statistically the number is insignificant. So while I didn’t just tell you we don’t have voter fraud, I did tell you it isn’t the problem that you and others think it is.




  5.  
    loyd

    Check out the voting violations uncovered in the last elections just in Ohio if you want some numbers.

    I’d rather drink tea party tea than eat what the lib’s are pushing!




  6.  
    Curtis Roberts

    When I voted I showed the poll personnel my drivers license, Level 3 security license,Private security license and my concealed carry license. If I can have four forms of ID that are current, then these cry babies can show one.




  7.  
    Paul

    Ohio’s results in the 2012 presidential vote: Barack Obama: 2,697,260 votes; Mitt Romney: 2,593,779 votes.

    17 out of over 5.5 million votes ain’t exactly “widespread voter fraud”. Lloyd. Check your facts before you publicly rant. You just make yourself look a foaming mouthed idiot otherwise.

    http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-ohio-voter-fraud-fox-news-20131218,0,5648726.story#ixzz2o1whZrUD




  8.  

    Ohio, really Loyd. As Paul pointed out voter fraud was not a bad as you made it out to be nor is in any other state. Everyone knows what the voter id laws are designed to do, except perhaps you and the over achiever Curtis. Who were you really trying to impress by showing you CC, private security license, and whatever a level 3 security license is. If that is some kind of government security clearance, based on my own experience, the government wouldn’t want you flashing those credentials around for a non security reason.




    •  
      loyd

      One illegal vote is too many, unless you are a lib and are used to dishonesty and lawlessness.

      I guess you’re proud huh?




      •  
        Benny

        Loyd…..One peckerwood Bagger is too many, even if you are the Republican Leader of the United States House of Represenatives. Even normal greed-head Repugs hate the Baggers. Don’t you read the papers? What do you eat? What are you smoking. I’m putting you on my Prayer List this minute. Why do you flakes hate America?




  9.  
    loyd

    Look at the condition of America and decide who hates it. Lib’s in control, think what’s happening to this country is good? What a sick bunch you are!




  10.  

    Loyd, Loyd, Loyd, you’re so misguided. It seems your hatred of America has warped your sense of reality. Cinsidering the rich are getting richer the poor are getting screwd left and right, the baggers are obstructing an already do nothing Cngress you should be happy happy happy.




  11.  
    loyd

    I’ll have to admit it is hard to be happy, the way you lib’s have screwed up this country sure makes it hard!




  12.  

    Somebody essentially help to make significantly posts I might state.
    That is the very first time I frequented your web page and up to
    now? I amazed with the research you made to make this particular post extraordinary.
    Fantastic job!





Leave a Response

(required)


9 × = twenty seven